Source assessmentSupporting
Draft Commission guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
High-risk AI system classificationRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 3/4 (actionability 1 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
These Guidelines aim to support providers and deployers of AI systems, as well as competent market surveillance authorities, in assessing whether an AI system should be classified as high-risk
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Draft Commission guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicHigh-risk AI system classification
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded