Source assessmentSupporting
Enhancing emotion regulation with an in situ socially assistive robot among LGBTQ+ youth with self-harm ideation: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
socially assistive robot emotion regulation trialAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Intervention participants will have unlimited access to Purrble over the deployment period, which can be used as much or as little as they like.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Williams, A. J., Cleare, S., Borschmann, R., Tench, C. R., Gross, J., Hollis, C., Chapman-Nisar, A., Naeche, N., Townsend, E., Slovak, P., & On behalf of Digital Youth (2024). Enhancing emotion regulation with an in situ socially assistive robot among LGBTQ+ youth with self-harm ideation: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 14(1), Article e079801.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicsocially assistive robot emotion regulation trial
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage4 Verify & validate
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded