Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Ethical Challenges in the Human-Robot Interaction Field

robotics ethicsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 1)

Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

No rationale recorded.

In this case, it is important to ensure that the participants are fully aware of how the study can aect them, e.g. by the use of informed consent and a debrieng session

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Ethical Challenges in the Human-Robot Interaction Field Julia Rosén julia.rosen@his.se University of Skövde Skövde, Sweden

Currency

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicrobotics ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Ethical Challenges in the Human-Robot Interaction Field · CEI AI Governance Database