Source assessmentCore
Ethical Challenges of Assistive Robotics in the Elderly Care: Review and Reflection
assistive robotics ethical challengesAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
The p roject t eam agreed that the robot’s functions must always be transparent. Complete and accessible information for consumers will be necessary when the system is introduced to the market.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
M. Abdel-Keream (*) University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany e-mail: abdelker@uni-bremen.de © The Author(s) 2023 U. Engel (ed.), Robots in Care and Everyday Life, SpringerBriefs in Sociology
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicassistive robotics ethical challenges
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded