Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Ethical concerns in rescue robotics: a scoping review

ethical concerns in rescue roboticsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Hazards and benefits should be fairly distributed … to avoid the possibility of some subjects incurring only costs while other subjects enjoy only benefits.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

REVIEW PAPER Ethical concerns in rescue robotics: a scoping review Linda Battistuzzi1 · Carmine Tommaso Recchiuto1 · Antonio Sgorbissa1 Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published online: 2 July 2021

Currency

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicethical concerns in rescue robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Ethical concerns in rescue robotics: a scoping review · CEI AI Governance Database