Source assessmentSupporting
Ethical Design and Use of Robotic Care of the Elderly
Ethical design of robotic careAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
In this paper I outline the ethical challenges of robotic care assistants and how these may be mediated in their design and use.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Bioethical Inquiry (2022) 19:11–14
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicEthical design of robotic care
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded