Source assessmentSupporting
Ethical Design of Social Robots in Aged Care: A Literature Review Using an Ethics of Care Perspective
ethical design of social robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
We further propose four design principles to guide designers in integrating care ethics into robot design requirements
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
International Journal of Social Robotics (2023) 15:1637–1654 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01053-6 REVIEW Ethical Design of Social Robots in Aged Care
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicethical design of social robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded