Ethical Regulation of Robots Must Be Embedded in Their Operating Systems
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
The chapter clearly names the authors of the work.
Level 1: Published as an academic book chapter by reputable institution Springer, representing an academic paper rather than a formal standard or binding law.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 1672 words of full text extracted
The source explicitly focuses on ethical control and operating systems for future AIs and robots.
The text discusses ethical regulation, moral and legal principles, and control of AI and robotic systems.
The chapter clearly names the authors of the work.
There is no indication on the page that this version has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides general direction and principles regarding embedding ethical control into operating systems without naming specific binding steps.
The authors argue that unless computational deontic logics (or, for that matter, any other class of systems for mechanizing moral and/or legal principles) or achieving ethical control of future AIs and robots are woven into the operating-system level of such artifacts, such control will be at best dangerously brittle.
Authority
1/2Level 1: Published as an academic book chapter by reputable institution Springer, representing an academic paper rather than a formal standard or binding law.
Govindarajulu, N.S., Bringsjord, S. (2015). Ethical Regulation of Robots Must Be Embedded in Their Operating Systems. In: Trappl, R. (eds) A Construction Manual for Robots' Ethical Systems.
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)