Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Ethics and Representation of Robots in Literatures

Ethics and Representation of RobotsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 2/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 1)

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Therefore, if we want to establish practical and realistic ethics of robotics, we need to intentionally ignore the representation of robots in literatures, and the rules of robotics such as the three laws of robotics in Asimov’s novels.

Authority

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Ethics and Representation of Robots in Literatures Kazuya Matsuura

Currency

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicEthics and Representation of Robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Ethics and Representation of Robots in Literatures · CEI AI Governance Database