Source assessmentSupporting
Evolving Skill Modules under a Fixed Planner: Versioning, Rollback, and Runtime Governance for Long-Lived Robot Systems
robot software architecture governanceAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
A lifecycle for learned skill modules, giving each module an explicit version, a promotion gate that admits a candidate only if it holds up on held-out evaluation, and a rollback path when a promoted version regresses.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Preprint submitted to Journal of Systems and Software September 21, 2026 arXiv:2604.07799v3 [cs.RO] 18 Sep 2026
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot software architecture governance
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage5 Deploy
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded