Source assessmentContext only
Exploring public opinion about liability and responsibility in surgical robotics with the iRobotSurgeon survey
liability and responsibility in surgical roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
1. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh 2. Department of Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds 3. Wellcome EPSRC centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, UK
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicliability and responsibility in surgical robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded