Source assessmentSupporting
Gathering Expert Opinions for Social Robots’ Ethical, Legal, and Societal Concerns: Findings from Four International Workshops
Social robots ethical legal societal concernsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
The paper also compiles the recommendations to these ELS issues the experts deem appropriate to mitigate compounding risks.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
International Journal of Social Robotics (2020) 12:441–458 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00605-z Gathering Expert Opinions for Social Robots’ Ethical, Legal, and Societal Concerns: Findings from Four International Workshops Eduard Fosch‑Villaronga1 · Christoph Lutz2 · Aurelia Tamò‑Larrieux3 Accepted: 1 November 2019 / Published online: 20 November 2019
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicSocial robots ethical legal societal concerns
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded