Source assessmentCore
Guidance Note on Consumer Protection and the Responsible Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning by Licensed Financial Institutions in the U.A.E.
consumer protection and responsible AI adoptionRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
LFIs should adopt a documented governance framework for AI and ML that is commensurate with the size, nature and complexity of their operations.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Guidance Note on the Consumer Protection and Responsible Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning by Licensed Financial Institutions in the U.A.E. | CBUAE Rulebook
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicconsumer protection and responsible AI adoption
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded