Source assessmentSupporting
MOCAI AI Ethics
AI ethics principles and guidelinesRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
This source has not been read into a full record yet; only the screening assessment is available.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
AI developers and AI operators could consider formal procedures such as Discrimination Impact Assessments as a means of ensuring fairness.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
This document is published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License in order to facilitate its re-use by other governments and private sector organizations.
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI ethics principles and guidelines
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded