Source assessmentSupporting
Hiroshima Process International Guiding Principles for Organizations Developing Advanced AI System
Hiroshima Process AI Guiding PrinciplesMultilateral
Assessment outcome
total 3/4 (actionability 1 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
These principles should apply to all AI actors, when and as applicable to cover the design, development, deployment and use of advanced AI systems.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
This site is managed by: Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicHiroshima Process AI Guiding Principles
PerspectiveMultilateral
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded