Source assessmentSupporting
Identifying key ethical debates for autonomous robots in agri-food: a research agenda
ethical debates for autonomous robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Yet they also advise engineers to consider the values of end-users and other stakeholders: they call this approach ethical co-design: 4.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Identifying key ethical debates for autonomous robots in agri‑food: a research agenda Mark Ryan1 · Simone van der Burg1 · Marc‑Jeroen Bogaardt1 Received: 24 July 2021 / Accepted: 21 September 2021 / Published online: 4 October 2021
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicethical debates for autonomous robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded