Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications

military robotics ethicsAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The chapter is clearly authored by Robert Sparrow.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 2: Peer-reviewed academic book chapter published by Springer.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2190 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is explicitly about unmanned systems and autonomous military applications.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It directly addresses safety, ethics, and legal rules regarding unmanned military systems.

G4 · Attributablepass

The chapter is clearly authored by Robert Sparrow.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this academic chapter has been superseded or retracted.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: Description or analysis only, offering discussion of implications without binding steps or principles.

This chapter identifies and discusses a number of issues under each of these headings and offers some analysis of the implications of each issue and how it might be addressed.

Authority

2/2

Score 2: Peer-reviewed academic book chapter published by Springer.

Sparrow, R. (2021). Killer Robots: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications. In: Valavanis, K.P., Vachtsevanos, G.J. (eds) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Cham.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicmilitary robotics ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
Granularitydocument
Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications · CEI AI Governance Database