Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
Multiple named authors are listed as responsible for the article.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 3751 words of full text extracted
The primary subject is robotic surgical technology and its malfunctions.
The text explicitly addresses legal responsibility, risk, and liability aspects of robotic surgery.
Multiple named authors are listed as responsible for the article.
There is no text on the page indicating that this published study has been superseded, withdrawn, or retracted.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Score 1: Provides general direction and principles regarding patient communication without specifying a binding procedural step.
Throughout the IC acquisition, in a surgery based on advanced technologies, informing the patient about eventualities such as robot malfunctioning and execution modalities becomes necessary
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Open Med (Wars) Open Med (Wars) 2976 med 101672167 med Open Medicine 2391-5463 De Gruyter PMC5329842
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)