Source assessmentSupporting
Applied Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Test and Evaluation Program for Consumer Products
AI/ML consumer product safety testingRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 2 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
The four steps are listed below: · SCREEN consumer products and identify the existence of AI/ML technologies · ASSESS capabilities and determine the implications of these technologies · ANALYZE contributing factors that AI/ML have to discern if hazardous · MONITOR/MEASURE conditions to determine if/when AI/ML evolves beyond safe parameters
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: NEVIN J. TAYLOR CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST OFFICE OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND REDUCTION
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI/ML consumer product safety testing
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded