Source assessmentSupporting
More Process, Less Principles: The Ethics of Deploying AI and Robotics in Medicine
ethics of deploying AI in medicineAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Ethically sound decisionmaking requires that the process by which medical institutions make such decisions include participatory, deliberative, and conservative elements.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (2024), 33: 1, 121 –134 doi:10.1017/S0963180123000087
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicethics of deploying AI in medicine
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage5 Deploy
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded