Source assessmentSupporting
Navigating the Tension Between the Rule of Law and Judicial Discretion Without Robot Judges
Judicial discretion and robot judgesAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
U.S. District Judge for the District of Oregon. University of California at Los Angeles (B.A., 1978); Harvard Law School (J.D., 1981)
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicJudicial discretion and robot judges
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded