Source assessmentCore
On Proactive, Transparent, and Verifiable Ethical Reasoning for Robots
ethical reasoning for robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
We propose that ethically critical machine reasoning should be proactive, transparent, and verifiable.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicethical reasoning for robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded