Source assessmentCore
Registrar's Circular No. 9 of 2024: Issue of the Guide on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools by Court Users
Generative AI use in courtsRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 6/6 (actionability 2 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total6/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
To ensure accuracy in the Court Documents you submit, you should do the following: (a) Fact-check and proof-read any AI-generated content that you use.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
IN THE STATE COURTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE REGISTRAR’S CIRCULAR NO. 9 OF 2024 ISSUE OF THE GUIDE ON THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS BY COURT USERS
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicGenerative AI use in courts
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded