Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Recognising rights for robots: Can we? Will we? Should we?

Robot legal personhood and rightsAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named authors Belinda Bennett and Angela Daly are identified in the notes on contributors.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1: Reputable academic institution acting officially through its faculty authors.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 3383 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The text directly focuses on artificial intelligence and robots as its primary subject.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source examines legal rules, rights, and regulatory issues concerning artificial intelligence.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named authors Belinda Bennett and Angela Daly are identified in the notes on contributors.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this academic article has been retracted or superseded.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Level 0: Description or analysis only, examining the law's response to robot rights without binding steps.

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Reputable academic institution acting officially through its faculty authors.

Belinda Bennett is Professor of Health Law and New Technologies, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicRobot legal personhood and rights
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page
Recognising rights for robots: Can we? Will we? Should we? · CEI AI Governance Database