Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in Artworks by Robots and Algorithms

IPR and AI-generated artworkAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Regulation should therefore seek to adapt to these new dynamics and ensure that creators, both human and machine, can be afforded fair and balanced protection.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Faculty of Law, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jakarta

Currency

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicIPR and AI-generated artwork
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded
Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in Artworks by Robots and Algorithms · CEI AI Governance Database