Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Reporting of Ethical Conduct in Human-Robot Interaction Research

Reporting of Ethical Conduct in HRIAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named authors are explicitly listed for the academic chapter.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 1: Level 1 because it is published by Springer as a peer-reviewed or conference proceeding book chapter by academic authors.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1057 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is primarily about human-robot interaction research practices.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source directly examines the reporting of ethical conduct and research governance principles in robotics.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named authors are explicitly listed for the academic chapter.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication that the published academic chapter has been superseded or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: Level 0 because it provides analysis and description of literature study findings without giving binding steps or principles.

Authority

1/2

Score 1: Level 1 because it is published by Springer as a peer-reviewed or conference proceeding book chapter by academic authors.

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 268. Springer, Cham.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicReporting of Ethical Conduct in HRI
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerhuman
Granularitydocument