Source assessmentCore
Responsible AI in Action
Responsible AI in regulatory practiceRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 6/6 (actionability 2 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total6/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Start by setting three foundations: 1. Align AI to purpose and priorities AI initiatives should link directly to your regulatory priorities and be reflected in strategic planning and performance frameworks.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Published in May 2026 by the Ministry for Regulation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicResponsible AI in regulatory practice
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded