Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Responsible Innovation ‘Bottom Up’? – Using mobile robots as a case

Mobile robots and responsible innovationAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Trollies had to be placed 20 cm from walls, to give room for the robots to be able to pick the trollies up.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Published in: Social Robots with AI DOI: 10.3233/FAIA241518 Publication date: 2025 Document version: Submitted manuscript Citation for pulished version (APA): Zawieska, K., Kollakidou, A., Bodenhagen, L., Krüger, N., Martin, C., Bendt, M., & Andersen, C. (2025). Responsible Innovation 'Bottom Up'? Using Mobile Robots as a Case. In J. Seibt, P. Fazekas, & O. S. Quick (Eds.), Social Robots with AI: Prospects, Risks, and Responsible Methods, Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2024 (pp. 320-330). IOS Press BV.

Currency

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicMobile robots and responsible innovation
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage5 Deploy
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Responsible Innovation ‘Bottom Up’? – Using mobile robots as a case · CEI AI Governance Database