Source assessmentSupporting
Review of legal frameworks, standards and best practices in verification and assurance for infrastructure inspection robotics
robotics verification and assuranceAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Organisations developing technology in this domain will need to make rigorous efforts to ensure and assure its safety, to comply with relevant legislation, and to adequately manage the liability they have should something go wrong
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
University of York 7 Main authors Reviewed by Accepted by Dr Youcef Gheraibia Mr Bob Kao Dr Rob Alexander Mr Phillip Morgan Dr Liam Kilvington
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobotics verification and assurance
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded