Source assessmentSupporting
Robot Care Ethics Between Autonomy and Vulnerability: Coupling Principles and Practices in Autonomous Systems for Care
robot care ethics autonomy vulnerabilityAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 1)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
This source has not been read into a full record yet; only the screening assessment is available.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
This paper starts by critically examining the existing approaches to the ethical design of care robots provided by Aimee van Wynsberghe, who relies on the work on the ethics of care by Joan Tronto.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Edited by: Martim Brandão, King’s College London, United Kingdom Reviewed by: David Gunkel, Northern Illinois University, United States Alistair Niemeijer, University of Humanistic Studies, Netherlands
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot care ethics autonomy vulnerability
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded