Source assessmentSupporting
Robot Lawyers and the Ethical Challenges of the Legal Profession in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
robot lawyers and legal ethicsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
The study highlights the need for a revised ethical paradigm that addresses the limitations of existing rules and accommodates the unique attributes of artificial intelligence.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
BALOBE Law Journal, 5 (2) October 2025: 95 - 105 E-ISSN: 2775-6149 Published by: Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot lawyers and legal ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded