Source assessmentSupporting
Robots as Mental Well-being Coaches: Design and Ethical Recommendations
robot well-being coach designAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
This source has not been read into a full record yet; only the screening assessment is available.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
This article details design and ethical recommendations based on a qualitative analysis drawing on a grounded theory approach
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Robots as Mental Well-being Coaches: Design and Ethical Recommendations MINJAAXELSSON, AFARLab(AffectiveIntelligenceandRoboticsLaboratory);DepartmentofComputer Science and Technology; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom MICOL SPITALE,Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy HATICE GUNES,AFAR Lab (Affective Intelligence and Robotics Laboratory); Department of Computer Science and Technology; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot well-being coach design
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded