Source assessmentCore
Robots in the moral loop: a field study of AI advisors in ethical military decision-making
AI advisors in ethical military decision-makingAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
moral-AI design should present trade-offs transparently, surface competing values concurrently, and rely on human reflection rather than assuming isolated AI prompts will durably reset moral priorities.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 01 frontiersin.org Robots in the moral loop: a field study of AI advisors in ethical military decision-making Chad C. Tossell
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI advisors in ethical military decision-making
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded