Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Robots Like Me: Challenges and Ethical Issues in Aged Care

Ethical issues in aged care robotsAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 1)

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authored by Ipke Wachsmuth and published in Frontiers in Psychology.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2811 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is entirely about care robots and artificial agents in aged care.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It directly discusses ethical issues, human dignity, and the normative acceptability of care robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authored by Ipke Wachsmuth and published in Frontiers in Psychology.

G5 · In forcepass

No indications of retraction, supersession, or repeal are present in the text.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0. The document offers philosophical analysis and discussion on aged care robots, naming no specific binding obligations, controls, or duties.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

OPINION published: 03 April 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00432 Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 1 April 2018 | Volume 9 | Article 432

Currency

1/2

computed: newest date 2018-04-04 (via pdf-meta), ~8.6y old; past the 60-month academic_research window for perspective 'Academic' but within 120 months — plausibly still the reference → 1

Classification

Coverage topicEthical issues in aged care robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
Granularitydocument