Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Rule-following robots? Transitional legal disruption through regulatee design and engineering

AI regulation and legal disruptionAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named author Hin-Yan Liu stands behind the work.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2416 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is centrally about AI and XR applications interfering with decision-making and legal regulation.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Directly addresses regulatory and legal challenges and governance implications of AI.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named author Hin-Yan Liu stands behind the work.

G5 · In forcepass

No notice of repeal, withdrawal, or supersession is present on the page.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Anchor 0: Description or analysis only, examining transitional legal disruption without naming specific binding obligations.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Hin-Yan Liu is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Disruption Research Group, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicAI regulation and legal disruption
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page
Rule-following robots? Transitional legal disruption through regulatee design and engineering · CEI AI Governance Database