Source assessmentCore
Secure Software Development Practices for Generative AI and Dual-Use Foundation Models: An SSDF Community Profile
Secure Software Development Framework AIStandards body
Assessment outcome
total 6/6 (actionability 2 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total6/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Secure code storage should include AI models, model weights, pipelines, reward models, and any other AI model elements that need their confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability protected.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
This publication has been developed by NIST in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicSecure Software Development Framework AI
PerspectiveStandards body
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded