Source assessmentSupporting
Service robots, care ethics, and design
Service robots and care ethics designAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 1)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
To use the framework, i.e. the methodology of the CCVSD approach, the ethicist and roboticist engage in a series of steps: data collection, value analyses, scenario comparisons, and recommendations based on the scenario comparisons.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Published online: 22 August 2016 /C211The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicService robots and care ethics design
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded