Source assessmentSupporting
Civil Law Rules on Robotics
civil law rules in roboticsRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 0)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency0/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
призовава Комисията да предложи общи определения на Съюза за кибер- физическите системи, автономните системи, интелигентните автономни роботи и техните подкатегории
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Резолюция на Европейския парламент от 16 февруари 2017 г., съдържаща препоръки към Комисията относно гражданскоправни норми за роботиката
Currency
0/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topiccivil law rules in robotics
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded