Source assessmentCore
Civil Law Rules on Robotics
Civil Law Rules on RoboticsRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Calls on the Commission to propose common Union definitions of cyber physical systems, autonomous systems, smart autonomous robots and their subcategories
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicCivil Law Rules on Robotics
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded