Source assessmentSupporting
The Realization and Limitations of “Filial Piety Ethics” in Robotic Caregiving
Filial Piety Ethics in Robotic CaregivingAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
They should not be seen as replacements for children but as tools to assist children in fulfilling their filial duties when caring for elderly parents.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
International Journal of Technoethics Volume 16 • Issue 1 • January-December 2025 DOI: 10.4018/IJT.366468 1 This article published as an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicFilial Piety Ethics in Robotic Caregiving
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded