Source assessmentContext only
The typification of infringement issues of humanoid robots: with special reference to the governance of infringement caused by learning algorithms
Humanoid robot infringement liability governanceAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 1/4 (actionability 1 + authority 0); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6
Total1/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
humanoid robot manufacturers should follow the dynamic national regulations based on their development stage and different application scenarios under the guidance of the Hand Formula; users should be responsible for their negligent behavior due to failure to fulfill reasonable care obligations
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Advances in Social Behavior Research Vol.16 Issue 5 EWA Publishing Available Online: 25 June 2025 DOI: 10.54254/2753-7102/2025.24455 The typification of infringement issues of humanoid robots: with special reference to the governance of infringement caused by learning algorithms Xiaojun An Department of Law, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, China
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicHumanoid robot infringement liability governance
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded