Source assessmentContext only
Three Ethical Arguments Against Killer Robots
Ethical arguments against killer robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6
Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
This source has not been read into a full record yet; only the screening assessment is available.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
The paper will discuss three ethical objections against LAWS: (1) the argument from the responsibility gap (Sparrow), (2) the argument from human agency (Leveringhaus), and (3) the argument from moral duty (Misselhorn).
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Category Research Article Series Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Ebook Volume 366: Social Robots in Social Institutions
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicEthical arguments against killer robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded