Source assessmentSupporting
Towards Trustworthy Physical Intelligence: From Theory to Practice Across the Life Cycle
Physical AI governance and life cycleAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
For each stage of the life cycle, we identify the key trustworthiness requirements, governance principles, and engineering practices needed to incorporate trustworthy AI components into the development and operation process.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
arXiv:2607.22877v4 [cs.AI] 3 Oct 2026 Contents Towards Trustworthy Physical Intelligence Abstract
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicPhysical AI governance and life cycle
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded