Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Trust and Trustworthiness from Human-Centered Perspective in HRI – A Systematic Literature Review

Trust in Human-Robot InteractionAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 0/4 (actionability 0 + authority 0); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 0.0/6

Total0/6
Actionability0/2
Authority0/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Multiple named authors from academic institutions are clearly identified.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 0: Sourced preprint article from arXiv, lacking official regulator or peer-reviewed journal status in text.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 9173 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is entirely about human-robot interaction and autonomous intelligent systems.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses ethics, trust, safety, and governance aspects of autonomous systems.

G4 · Attributablepass

Multiple named authors from academic institutions are clearly identified.

G5 · In forcepass

No indication of supersession or repeal is present on the page.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Level 0: Description or analysis only, detailing review methodology without binding steps.

This systematic literature review followed the guidelines preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) for qualitative synthesis Moher et al. (2009) and structured the process as in the following steps

Authority

0/2

Level 0: Sourced preprint article from arXiv, lacking official regulator or peer-reviewed journal status in text.

A PREPRINT - FEBRUARY 3, 2025 1 Introduction Our project is a competition on Kaggle

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicTrust in Human-Robot Interaction
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitydocument