Source assessmentSupporting
Trustworthiness and Well-Being: The Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenge of Robotic Assistance
Trust and social acceptance of robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Chapter 1 Trustworthiness and Well-Being: The Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenge of Robotic Assistance Michael Beetz, Uwe Engel, Nina Hoyer, Lorenz Kähler, Hagen Langer, Holger Schultheis, and Sirko Straube AbstractIf a technology lacks social acceptance
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicTrust and social acceptance of robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded