Under-insured, over-insured, but not properly insured: the structural liability-coverage gap in co-located robotic surgery and telesurgery
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
Named authors and institutions are explicitly listed at the end of the text.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 1842 words of full text extracted
The source focuses centrally on robotic-assisted surgery, telesurgery, and AI-assisted medical actions.
It discusses liability, risk apportionment, insurance coverage, and legal standards in medical robotics.
Named authors and institutions are explicitly listed at the end of the text.
The document is current with no indications of being superseded or repealed.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides direction and analysis on insurance products without setting binding steps or obligations for the reader.
We contend that the field requires a single, outward-facing, multi-domain integrated liability insurance product — one coherent contract with a single coverage trigger
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Diamond, D.A., Moschovas, M.C., Dohler, D. et al. Under-insured, over-insured, but not properly insured: the structural liability-coverage gap in co-located robotic surgery and telesurgery. J Robotic Surg 20 , 979 (2026).
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)