Source assessmentSupporting
What ethical AI and robots could mean: a conceptual and ethical reflection
ethical AI and robotics reflectionAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
A first step is therefore to identify the purpose of the system, the type of interaction or collaboration it is intended to support, and normative expectations together with key values of the domain.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
REVIEWED BY Paul Gérard Dumouchel, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada Antonio Fleres, Università IULM, Italy *CORRESPONDENCE Jana Sedlakova, jana.sedlakova@ethox.ox.ac.uk
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicethical AI and robotics reflection
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded