Source assessmentSupporting
What Is My Robot Thinking? Design Considerations for Transparent and Trustworthy Shared Autonomy
transparent shared autonomy roboticsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Based on these results, we outline guidelines for designing transparent shared autonomy systems.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
What Is My Robot Thinking? Design Considerations for Transparent and Trustworthy Shared Autonomy Atharv Belsare 1∗, Zohre Karimi 1,2, Connor Mattson 1,2, Rushiil Nakka 1 and Daniel S. Brown 1,2
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topictransparent shared autonomy robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded