Civil Liability Arising from the Use of Intelligent Robots in the Field of Medical Science
This academic paper examines civil liability arising from the use of intelligent robots in medical science, focusing on robotic surgeries and distinguishing between software and hardware malfunctions. It explores the theoretical foundations governing the civil liability of surgical teams and software developers, analyzing how traditional legal doctrines apply to autonomous and semi-autonomous medical technologies. The authors argue that since robots lack legal personhood, human agents and institutions must be held accountable for damages based on relevant legal principles.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Legal scholars, lawmakers, and medical professionals should read this to understand how civil liability applies to the use of autonomous and intelligent surgical robots.
What the document contains
The document addresses the legal theories and frameworks surrounding civil liability for harm caused by intelligent robots in medical contexts, examining software and hardware malfunctions, the role of surgical teams, and the adequacy of existing Iranian and comparative legal doctrines.
The document does not provide binding legislative enactments, statutory codes, or enforceable regulatory standards, but rather offers an academic and comparative legal analysis.
- Intelligent robots lack legal or natural personhood and cannot bear independent legal liability for surgical harms.
- Civil liability in robotic surgeries must distinguish between hardware failures and software malfunctions.
- Surgical teams and supervising doctors can be held liable under negligence or causation theories if they fail in their duty to properly monitor or control robotic assistants.
- Current Iranian laws regarding software design errors and robotic medical malfunctions show significant regulatory gaps and rely heavily on inadequate administrative or disciplinary rules.
· Abstract · Introduction · Conceptual Terminology · Traditional Civil Liability Arising from Objects · Characteristics of Artificial Intelligence · Establishing Civil Liability of Surgeons and Surgical Teams in Robotic Surgeries · Conclusion
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
4/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
جراحی که روبات را کنترل میکند یا روبات در کنار او به عنوان دستیار به عمل جراحی میپردازد در صورتی که قادر باشد روبات دچار اختلال را متوقف نماید و در این کار مرتکب بیمبالاتی شود مسؤول میباشد.
ب- حدود وثغور تأثیر اختلال نرم افزاری بر مسؤلیت مدنی
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
1/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
بر اساس نظریه تقصیر، اشخاص مسئول اعمال و وقایعی هستند که مقصود آنها با شد یا آگاهانه خود را در معرض آن قرار دهند و ایشان را بتوان برای انتخاب رفتار خاص از جهت آگاهی از عواقب کار خود سرزنش کرد
ج- نظریه تقصیرماشین
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
4/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
متصرف شیء نمایندة مالک تلقی میشود و از این جنبه، مسئولیت او به معنای شناسایی م سئولیت برای مالک است؛ مگر اینکه از حدود اختیارات خود خارج شود
مسؤلیت مالک و متصرف
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
3/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
این نوشتار به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی است و نگارنده میکوشد تا به موازات تبیین بنیانهای نظری حاکم بر مسؤولیت مدنی تیم جراحی در جراحیهای روباتیک در خصوص اختلالات نرم افزاری و اختلالات سخت افزاری که روند جراحی را مختل ساخته و موجبات ایراد لطمه به بیمار را فراهم میآورد
چکیده
screening score · 2026-10-23