Source assessmentSupporting
Civil Liability Arising from the Use of Intelligent Robots in the Field of Medical Science
Civil liability of robotic surgeriesAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
This paper employs a descriptive -analytical method, and the author seeks to, alongside explaining the theor etical foundations governing the civil liability of surgical teams in robotic surgeries, distinguish between software and hardware malfunctions that disrupt surgical procedures and may result in harm to patients
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
How to cite: Hamedi, H., Moradi, A., & Aqaibejestani, M. (2024). Civil Liability Arising from the Use of Intelligent Robots in the Field of Medical Science. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 2(3), 214-237.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicCivil liability of robotic surgeries
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded